Apple overturns Motorola's iPad and iPhone sales bans
Motorola Mobility had forced Apple to remove several iPad
and iPhone models from its online store earlier today after
enforcing a patent infringement court ruling delivered in December.
An appeals court lifted the ban after Apple made a new licence payment offer.
However, Germany-based users may still face the loss of
their push email iCloud service after a separate ruling.
Patent consultant Florian Mueller, who attended the review,
said that the suspension may only last a few days or weeks -
but that Apple's revised proposal had been enough to allow it to restart sales.
"The Karlsruhe higher regional court believes that Apple's new
offer needs to be evaluated before this injunction can enter into
force again,"he wrote on his blog.
"A suspension like this is available only against a bond, but Apple is
almost drowning in cash and obviously won't have had a problem
with obtaining and posting a bond."
He said that the bond amount was likely to have been about 120m
euros ($158m, £100m).
UnresolvedA statement from Apple said: "All iPad and iPhone models will be
back on sale through Apple's online store in Germany shortly.
"Apple appealed this ruling because Motorola repeatedly refuses to
license this patent to Apple on reasonable terms, despite having
declared it an industry standard patent seven years ago."
However, Motorola signalled that it would try to restore the ban.
"We are pleased that the Mannheim court has recognized the
importance of our intellectual property and granted an enforceable
injunction in Germany against Apple Sales International," a statement said.
"Although the enforcement of the injunction has been temporarily
suspended, Motorola Mobility will continue to pursue its claims against Apple."
Pulled productsThe sales ban relates to Motorola's patent for a "method for performing a
countdown function during a mobile-originated transfer for a packet radio system".
Motorola licenses the patent to other companies on Frand (fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory) terms.
Frand-type patents involve technologies that are deemed to be part
of an industry standard. In this case Motorola's innovation is deemed
crucial to the GPRS data transmission standard used by GSM cellular
networks across the world.
Companies must offer Frand-type patents for
a reasonable fee to anyone willing to pay.
Apple had previously said it would be willing
to pay the fee going forward, but the two firms
dispute how much Apple should pay for failing to
license the technology up until now. Missed payments
are not covered by the "reasonable" rule, and Motorola
is able to demand a more expensive price.
Apple's iPhone 3G, iPhone 3GS and iPhone 4 had all
been affected - but not its newer iPhone 4S. All 3G
models of the iPad were involved, but not their wi-fi-only counterparts.
Email technologyThe separate push email ban would only come into
effect if Motorola decided to enforce a second
judgement that Apple's iCloud and MobileMe
infringed another of its innovations.
The patent relates to two-way communications
between pagers and other devices and was granted in 2002.
If Motorola decides to enforce the judgement some iPhone users
in Germany would lose the ability to automatically receive
emails as soon as they have been sent. Instead they would either have to manually check their accounts or set their devices to periodically check for updates.
This patent is not deemed to be critical to an industry standard, so the firm does not have to license the technology to Apple even if the iPhone-maker offered to pay.
No comments:
Post a Comment